Showing posts with label Donald Rumsfeld. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Donald Rumsfeld. Show all posts

Friday, January 23, 2009

Officials Begin Movement Toward the Proscecution of Bush and Rumsfeld for Approving Illegal Torture


The first indications of global concerns being expressed for the United States to prosecute former president George W. Bush and former secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld have begun to be made. In the January 20th, 2009 edition of the British newspaper, Telegraph.co.uk, referred to a recent interview given to the German television program "Frontal 21," on channel ZDF by Mr. Manfred Nowak, the United Nation's Special Rapporteur on Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment as appointed by The United Nations Commission on Human Rights

According to the Telegraph, Mr Nowak: "called on the US authorities to pursue the former president and his former defence secretary for the treatment of prisoners held at the Guantanamo Bay camp in Cuba."

During his interview on German television, Mr Nowak said: "Judicially speaking, the United States has a clear obligation," which according to the AFP news agency "to bring charges against Bush and Rumsfeld." By being a signatory nation to the United Nations torture convention, which Mr. Nowak said on ZDF; that the U.S. should employ "all means, particularly penal law" against offenders of the convention on torture.

Mr. Nowak observed on ZDF that: "We have all these documents that are now publicly available that prove that these methods of interrogation were intentionally ordered by Rumsfeld," that AFP explains were "against detainees at the US prison facility in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Nowak said."

Nowak also said on ZDF: "But obviously the highest authorities in the United States were aware of this," AFP adds that Mr. Nowak "authored a UN investigation report on the Guantanamo prison."

When queried by ZDF whether prosecution against Bush and Rumsfeld would be possible Mr. Nowak replied: "In principle yes. I think the evidence is on the table." Mr. Nowak however acknowledged that it is questionable whether "American law will recognize these forms of torture."

The Telegraph reports that: "A bipartisan Senate report released last month found Mr Rumsfeld and other senior Bush administration officials responsible for the abuse of Guantanamo detainees." In an article published on December 11, 2008, according to Scott Shane and Mark Mazzetti, reporters for The New York Times; "top Bush administration officials, including Donald H. Rumsfeld, the former defense secretary, bore major responsibility for the abuses committed by American troops in interrogations at Abu Ghraib in Iraq; Guantánamo Bay, Cuba; and other military detention centers." The Telegraph continues it's reporting by adding: "that Mr Rumsfeld had authorized harsh interrogation techniques on Dec 2, 2002, although he ruled them out a month later. The coercive measures were based on a document signed by Mr Bush in February 2002."

Adding to the legal violations facing Mr. Bush and Mr. Rumsfeld is that in 1988, then-President Ronald Reagan signed the United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and the United States Senate, in 1990, ratified the treaty which by doing so, the Senate, as decreed by the Constitution of the United States, made violations of the treaty subject to punishment by the U.S. legal system.

In previously detailed developments, The Washington Post's Bob Woodward has reported that Susan J. Crawford: "The top Bush administration official in charge of deciding whether to bring Guantanamo Bay detainees to trial has concluded that the U.S. military tortured a Saudi national who allegedly planned to participate in the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, interrogating him with techniques that included sustained isolation, sleep deprivation, nudity and prolonged exposure to cold, leaving him in what Ms. Crawford termed a "life-threatening condition.""

In a story dated April 11th, 2008, then-President Bush told several ABC news reporters that: "... he knew his top national security advisers discussed and approved specific details about how high-value al Qaeda suspects would be interrogated by the Central Intelligence Agency,... Well," Mr. Bush explained: "we started to connect the dots in order to protect the American people.... And yes, I'm aware our national security team met on this issue. And I approved." ABC news also reported that: "... the most senior Bush administration officials repeatedly discussed and approved specific details of exactly how high-value al Qaeda suspects would be interrogated by the CIA. The high-level discussions about these "enhanced interrogation techniques" were so detailed, these sources said, some of the interrogation sessions were almost choreographed -- down to the number of times CIA agents could use a specific tactic. These top advisers signed off on how the CIA would interrogate top al Qaeda suspects -- whether they would be slapped, pushed, deprived of sleep or subjected to simulated drowning, called waterboarding."

During a January 11th, 2009 interview with Brit Hume of Fox News, former-President Bush acknowledged that he had authorized the torture of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Although no legally definitive decisions have been reached yet; it would seem that either the United States, or the World Court are on a course that is leading them ever closer to the prosecution of former-President Bush and former-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld as well as a number of other, allegedly involved Bush administration officials for having participated in the conduct of illegal acts involving violations of U.S. and international legal documents.

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

The Vice Presidency of Dick Cheney: His No Regrets Legacy of Disgrace and Dishonor

The Philadelphia Inquirer has written an editorial on the soon to be former Vice President, Dick Cheney. Vice President Dick Cheney was the experienced Washington pro whose decade’s long familiarity with the corridors of power in our nation’s capital was supposed to serve as the mentor to the newly elected, younger, more charismatic, but less experienced compassionate conservative George Bush. At least that’s how the media touted Cheney’s own recommendation of himself to serve as Bush’s Vice President. George Bush was touted as a bipartisan leader whose governing style would bring Americans together for the greater good of the nation. The oddity of all the hype was that nothing ended up working like it was supposed to. Bush viewed the presidency much as a CEO who headed up a corporation and he ended up delegating many of his powers away to those who served under him. Bush decided and others governed; at least that’s what the American people have come to understand from the masses of books written so far about the Bush Presidency. But instead of offering advice and guidance; Cheney saw an opportunity to take advantage of Bush’s lax leadership style and assumed powers far beyond any other vice president in American history. In fact, Bush and Cheney acted with such indiscretion that they quickly assumed powers that superseded the Constitution. The Bush Administration, under advisement by its own Justice Department and with the support of an acquiescing Congress that was firmly controlled by the Republican Party, made the legal distinction that the Constitution intentionally allowed for a hierarchical, unified executive branch of the federal government that placed the President at the apex of the nation’s government. Bush and Cheney effectively gave themselves complete control over the government and they governed for eight years with those principles in mind. Now, however, the eight years of Bush rule are nearly over and the administration; suffering from pitifully low public opinion ratings and soon to be displaced by a Democratic President and Congress, have launched a “Legacy Project” to smooth over the rough edges of public sentiment by giving the administration their own opportunity to define the first draft of the historic record of the Bush Administration. Bush went to bat first to give an overview that would define the shape and fill the contours of history from Bush’s ‘first hand’ knowledge of what really happened. Later, other administration officials would fill in the details to provide the administration with an exemplary record of accomplishment. Enter Cheney. The Vice President who never bothered with telling the truth in the past, because governing, from Cheney’s point of view, didn’t mean that his take on events needed to line up with the facts. For Cheney, truth was a commodity that he used to construct a reality that always placed the Bush Administration in the most unassailable position possible, thus protecting the administration against criticism. This practice of switch and bait that was played with the truth worked well enough for Bush to gain a second term in office before the frequency of telling lies could no longer outpace the truth. And once the truth about the Bush Administration’s deceptions gained general acceptance among the citizenry, Bush lost the trust of the vast majority of the American people. Now all we are left with is farce: “In an interview just before Christmas with the administration-friendly Fox News, Cheney offered no regrets about the invasion of Iraq, the illegal tapping of American citizens' phones and e-mail by government agents, or the torture of terror suspects. He defended former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and said he "did a good job" - despite the failures in Iraq. In an earlier interview with ABC News, Cheney suggested the administration would have invaded Iraq even without the bogus intelligence claiming Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction. That certainly conforms with what former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill said took place at the very first National Security Council meeting 10 days after the inauguration - eight months before the Sept. 11 terror attacks. At the meeting, O'Neill says, the main topic of discussion was regime change in Iraq.” To add justification to going to war with Iraq after the terrible events of September 11th, 2001, the Bush White House forged documents, twisted intelligence reports and spread false claims that Saddam Hussein controlled stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction that he was prepared to unleash on America and its allies. When former ambassador Joseph Wilson “accused the administration of doctoring prewar intelligence on Iraq in a New York Times commentary, it was a top aide to President Bush and Vice President Cheney, I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby who outed “the name of Wilson's wife, CIA official Valerie Plame,.. to reporters in 2003. After years of denying the torturing of terrorist suspects; “Cheney said recently that he approved of the administration's use of coercive interrogation tactics, including waterboarding - which is illegal under the Geneva Conventions. But Cheney doesn't think rules apply to the White House. He seemed proud of the broad expansion of executive power that he helped craft and implement... So much for checks and balances, let alone the Constitution.” The time for the impeachment of Bush and Cheney has long passed with just days left in their terms of office. But it is not too late, nor should it be overlooked that once out of office, Bush, Cheney and other suspected lawbreakers in the administration be investigated with all appropriate dispatch and if found.